|
Expert Guide
|
Experienced Guide
|
Nomad Guide
|
|
Map Presentation
|
Map is neat and well organized. There is a reason for
the order of
sites visited. |
Map is neat. |
The map is confusing and would not be able to be
followed by the "World's
Best" trackers. |
|
Written Form
|
The paragraphs are well written and are word
processed. Spelling,
capitalization, punctuation, indentation and grammar are accurate. |
Paragraphs are written in cursive. Spelling,
capitalization,
punctuation and grammar are correct. |
The paragraphs are hard to read. There are many
errors. |
|
Contents of Writing
|
The writing accurately depicts the information
contained in the web
site used. It presents a clear picture of what would be shown to
the group. |
The writing depicts the information contained in the
web sites used.
The picture the wroting presents could be clearer. |
What did the web sites show? |
Selection of
Web Sites
|
More than one of the sites seleted for thetour that
directly relates
to the tour groups heritage. |
Exactly one connection to the groups heritage. |
No connections! |
|
Budget
|
Budget is accurate and complete. |
The buget is somewhat accurate. Some mistakes. |
Budget is not accurate. Many mistakes. |