
University of Northern Iowa
Level II Teacher Work Sample
Assessment Rubric
Contextual
Factors
The
teacher candidate uses information about the learning-teaching context
and student individual differences to set learning goals, design
instruction and plan assessment
|
1
Indicator Not Met
|
2
Indicator Partially Met
|
3
Indicator Met
|
4
Indicator Exceeded
|
|
Have two
student characteristics been described?
Have two physical aspects of the classroom (e.g., posters, room
arrangement, technology) been discussed?
Have the instructional implications been discussed for each
characteristic?
|
Provides a poorly
developed, irrelevant, or inaccurate description of classroom and
student factors, which are not linked to instruction implications or
unlikely to have an impact on student achievement.
Example
|
Provides an accurate, moderately developed description of two classroom
and student factors but the instructional implications are either
limited, vague, irrelevant, inaccurate, or likely to have a minimal
impact on student achievement.
Example
|
Provides accurate, developed descriptions of two significant classroom
and student factors and identifies appropriate instructional
implications that are likely to have an impact on student achievement.
Example
|
Provides accurate, developed descriptions of two student factors and
two classroom implications that are highly likely to have an impact on
student achievement.
Discusses instructional implications with unusual
insight and depth of analysis.
|
Design for Instruction
The
teacher candidate designs instruction for specific learning goals,
individual student characteristics, and learning contexts
Learning
Goals / Justification
The teacher sets significant,
challenging, varied and appropriate learning goals.
|
1
Indicator Not Met |
2
Indicator Partially Met |
3
Indicator Met |
4
Indicator Exceeded |
Are
the learning goals are based on observable behaviors.
Do the learning goals describe what students will learn and be able to
do by the end of the lesson?
Are the learning goals clearly stated and described as learning
outcomes. They should not be descriptions of classroom activities.
Is there a rationale given that justifies the learning goal(s) as
relevant, challenging, and appropriate.
|
The learning goals
do not reflect a variety of thinking skills and are not developmentally
appropriate, i.e., they either do not pose a significant challenge or
they are too difficult.
Example
|
The learning goals
are age appropriate and some require higher level thinking skills, but
they do not pose a developmentally appropriate challenge.
Example
|
All learning goals are developmentally appropriate, require or lead to
higher level thinking, and pose a significant challenge for students.
Example
|
The learning goals demonstrate an uncommon understanding of significant
and challenging learning for this context and reflect a variety of
thinking skills.
|
Assessment
Plan / Analysis of Pre-assessment Data
The teacher candidate will
recognize that there are multiple assessment approaches that must be
aligned with learning goals to assess student learning before, during
and after instruction. An attempt is made by the teacher candidate to
design student assessments.
|
1
Indicator Not Met |
2
Indicator Partially Met |
3
Indicator Met |
4
Indicator Exceeded |
Has
student learning been pre-assessed in some way?
Are there multiple modes of assessment?
Is the approach to assessment clearly described?
Is there a description of the sample size?
Is there a description of student's previous knowledge and/or the PLS
instructor’s descriptions of past assessments and activities?
|
Content and methods of assessment do not match
learning goals, are not appropriate and lack variety.
Example
|
Content and methods of assessment match some learning goals, are
inappropriate, or lack variety.
Example
|
Content and methods of assessment do match all learning goals and are
appropriate and are varied.
Example
|
Content and methods of assessment demonstrate a variety of creative and
authentic techniques
|
Motivation for Learning / Activities:
The teacher candidate designs
instruction for specific learning goals, individual student
characteristics, and learning contexts
|
1
Indicator Not Met |
2
Indicator Partially Met |
3
Indicator Met |
4
Indicator Exceeded |
Has
the author described what they would do to motivate student learning?
Has the relevance of the learning goals to the everyday lives of
students been established?
Have the learning goals been connected to the sequence of the
curriculum?
Have all the relevant materials or technology been listed?
|
Few activities are explicitly linked to learning goals; content is
inaccurate, illogical sequence, used one instructional strategy.
Example
|
Most activities are explicitly linked to learning goals. Most content
is accurate. Lesson has logical sequence, but contains over-reliance on
one instructional strategy
Example
|
All activities are explicitly linked to learning goals. All content is
accurate. Lesson has logical sequence, and contains a variety of
instructional strategies.
Example
|
Activities and content of the lesson demonstrate unusual creativity,
flexible use of many instructional strategies, and a rare understanding
of how authentic tasks support student learning.
|
Instructional Decision Making:
The teacher analyzes student
learning to make instructional decisions
|
1
Indicator Not Met |
2
Indicator Partially Met |
3
Indicator Met |
4
Indicator Exceeded |
|
Has the author
described student responses thoroughly and in sufficient detail?
Has the author utilized specific examples to describe student responses?
Has the author described how they will adjust their second lesson?
Are the adjustments based on the description of student responses?
|
Little description and no specific examples of
student responses. Adjustments to the lesson are inappropriate,
unconnected to student responses or are not likely to lead to student
learning.
Example
|
Some description of student responses but few or no
specific examples are given. Adjustments to the lesson are
either not based on student responses or are not likely to lead to
student learning.
Example
|
Well-developed description of student responses with
multiple examples given. Instructional decisions are based on
student responses, are appropriate, and are likely to lead to student
learning.
Example
|
Unusual insight accompanies a rich description of
student responses with multiple examples given. Instructional
decisions are based on student responses, are likely to lead to student
learning, and demonstrate advanced understanding.
|
Analysis of Student
Learning:
The teacher candidate uses
assessment data to profile student learning and communicate information
about student progress and achievement.
|
1
Indicator Not Met |
2
Indicator Partially Met |
3
Indicator Met |
4
Indicator Exceeded |
|
Was the assessment
plan carried out as described, i.e. has data been reported for all
assessments listed n the assessment plan?
Have all claims about student learning been
supported with observable data (e.g. student writing, test results,
specific student comments, or observed student performance) in the form
of specific examples?
Has the author discussed whether or not the learning
goals have been met?
Has the author explained why the learning goals have
or have not been met?
Has achievement data been reported for the
individual students?
|
Little or no specific data or examples of student learning are
reported. There is little follow through on the assessment plan.
The discussion is too brief, draws questionable conclusions without
presenting evidence, and does not address the learning goals.
Example
|
Little specific data or examples of student learning
are reported. There is partial follow through on the assessment
plan. The discussion draws conclusions without presenting evidence or
by relying on limited evidence, and does not address the learning goals.
Example
|
Well-developed presentation of specific data and/or
multiple examples of student learning are reported. The entire
assessment plan is carried out and reported. The discussion draws
appropriate conclusions based on multiple sources of evidence.
Example
|
Unusual insight accompanies a rich presentation of
specific data and/or multiple examples of student learning. The
discussion draws conclusions of uncommon insight based on multiple
sources of evidence.
|
Reflection and Self Evaluation:
The teacher candidate analyzes
the relationship between his or her instruction and student learning in
order to improve teaching practice.
|
1
Indicator Not Met |
2
Indicator Partially Met |
3
Indicator Met |
4
Indicator Exceeded |
|
Has the author
identified the strategies that s/he believes contributed most to
student learning?
Has the author described whether or the adjustments described in
Instructional Decision-Making were successful or not?
Has the author discussed what s/he could do differently or better in
the future to improve their students' performance?
Has the author described two areas of professional growth?
Has the author identified two professional growth activities?
|
Does not to link student learning to teacher behaviors. Does not
provide a rationale for the success or failure of lesson
adjustments. Few or no ideas for future improvements,
professional growth, or professional growth activities.
Example
|
Identifies successful and unsuccessful activities
and makes some connections between student learning and teacher
behaviors. Offers a brief rationale for lesson adjustments.
Has a few ideas for improvement or professional growth but these are
not connected to this teaching experience and thus do not appear to be
a consequence of reflective practice.
Example
|
Identifies successful and unsuccessful activities
and makes strong connections between student learning and teacher
behaviors. Offers an in depth and thoughtful rationale for lesson
adjustments based on best practice. The ideas for improvement or
professional growth are clearly connected to this teaching experience
and are likely to have an impact on student achievement.
Example
|
Identifies successful and unsuccessful activities
and makes strong connections between student learning and teacher
behaviors. Offers an uncommonly thoughtful rationale for lesson
adjustments based on best practice and learning theory. The ideas for
improvement or professional growth are clearly connected to this
teaching experience, are highly appropriate, and are likely to have an
impact on student achievement.
|
|